The James Cameron Rabbit Hole

Our aim at Athena is to give you your time back so you can spend it in the ways that matter most.

In each issue of our newsletter you’ll get unique delegation tips.

The Rabbit Hole James Cameron Couldn’t Escape

In 1997, James Cameron had just directed Titanic. Studios were throwing blank checks at him. Any project, any budget.

He turned them all down.

Instead, Cameron vanished from Hollywood completely. No scripts. No meetings. No films.

Where was he? Seven miles below the ocean's surface.

Cameron became obsessed with deep-sea exploration after Titanic. He dove to the wreckage 33 times.

Not as research, but just to see.

He designed his own submersibles when existing ones couldn't go deep enough. He learned to pilot them himself when no one else would take the risk.

Eventually, Cameron became the first person to solo-dive to the Mariana Trench (earth's deepest point) in a vessel he helped engineer.

Hollywood thought he'd lost his mind. He was essentially walking away from $100 million in missed opportunities.

But Cameron didn’t see it as “wasting time.” He was filling a creative well, going down a rabbit hole.

When he finally returned to make Avatar, he was able to build an entire world directly from what he discovered in the darkness below.

The bioluminescent forests of Pandora? Inspired by the deep-sea creatures that glow in the darkness.

The fluid movements of the Na'vi? Modeled after how creatures move in water.

That "pointless detour" produced the highest-grossing film of all time. A $3 billion franchise built entirely on a rabbit hole everyone told him not to follow.

When something continuously pulls at you, it may not be just a distraction.

It might be your instincts revealing what your conscious mind hasn't yet recognized.

But this kind of exploration requires space. If your calendar resembles a game of Tetris, you've greatly reduced the possibility of your own creative breakthrough.

The Quick Sync Trap

A calendar full of "quick syncs" is the death of deep work.

I watched our assistant almost fall for it last week. A vague meeting request from an enterprise client appeared in our inbox:

"We should connect sometime in the next few weeks.”

Many assistants take this at face value and instantly schedule the meeting.

A seasoned assistant, deeply attuned to their executive’s world, would recognize the telltale signs of a non-urgent request:

Overly polite, non-specific language with no suggested dates or times and zero actual urgency.

Instead of defaulting to "accept," she would pause, assess, and, if needed, propose the next step—rather than prematurely flagging it as important.

That’s the difference between filling a calendar and protecting an executive’s time.

Every "quick sync" steals 30 minutes that could have been spent on deep work, strategy, or, honestly, just taking a walk to clear your head.

This is a textbook case of a 'False Positive'—treating too many things as urgent and overloading your schedule.

Great assistants aren't just gatekeepers of time but curators of focus.

And the best ones know that sometimes, the right decision is to pause and let things unfold.

Read more here on how to reduce false positives.